The Intricacies of Bitcoin Cash Forks: A Tale of Diverging Paths
A new cryptocurrency called Bitcoin SV emerged, while Bitcoin Cash remained true to its original protocols. “Satoshi’s Vision,” the meaning behind SV, pays homage to Satoshi Nakamoto, the creator of Bitcoin.
November 15, 2018, marked the division of Bitcoin Cash into two entities: Bitcoin Cash and Bitcoin SV. As one of the top 30 cryptocurrencies by market capitalization, Bitcoin Cash is the most notable of Bitcoin’s numerous forks.
In the cryptocurrency realm, a “hard fork” refers to the division of an existing blockchain into two separate entities. November 2018 saw the division of Bitcoin Cash into Bitcoin ABC and Bitcoin SV. The new fork integrates updates or technical changes, diverging from the original, which maintains its protocols and ledger. Typically, post-fork, a wallet holding the original cryptocurrency will have parallel amounts on both networks.
A hard fork renders the new network incompatible with earlier software versions. Contrasting with soft forks, which allow cross-protocol communication with older versions, hard forks dismiss any blocks adhering to old rules, essentially birthing a new blockchain, network, and cryptocurrency.
Whether due to disagreements or planned protocol changes, hard forks result in separate paths for miner and developer groups. One faction insists on retaining the original guidelines, while the other pioneers a new blockchain and digital token.
Bitcoin Cash’s hard fork in 2018 emerged from escalating tensions among its developers, who rallied behind Roger Ver or Craig Wright, notable cryptocurrency advocates unable to find common ground.
Elevating the block size limit from 32MB to 128MB fueled Bitcoin SV’s creation. Block size influences how much data can fill a block, much like limited-space cells on a spreadsheet. Developers argue that expanding this limit allows for more transactions per block, potentially reducing blockchain processing times.
By increasing processing speeds, blockchains can lessen the fees participants incur. Furthermore, swifter blockchains may appeal to users by minimizing network delay during transaction validation and fund receipt.
Without consensus on augmenting block size limits, one side initiated a fork, while the other adhered to its customary operations.
Important
Since 2016, Wright has repeatedly sued Bitcoin developers for copyright infringement, seeking intellectual property rights for the Bitcoin blockchain. In February 2024, the Crypto Open Patent Alliance (COPA) litigated against Wright for falsely claiming to be Nakamoto. The March 2024 hearing concluded with the judge siding with COPA, acknowledging the substantial evidence against Wright’s assertion.
Bitcoin Cash’s original framework, championed by Roger Ver—lauded for his fervent digital currency advocacy—remained his preference over the proposed hard fork.
Wright, frequently claiming to be Satoshi Nakamoto, advocated expanding BCH’s block size from 32MB to 128MB, arguing this alignment with Bitcoin’s original vision conceived the “Satoshi’s Vision” moniker.
A philosophical and technical rift over boosting transaction limits prompted Bitcoin Cash’s 2017 fork from Bitcoin. Proponents like Jihan Wu, Craig Wright, and Roger Ver posited that increasing block size would facilitate faster, cost-effective transactions, albeit at higher node storage costs.
Small-block proponents, including Blockstream, recommended handling microtransactions off-chain while advocating smaller blocks. Given the discord, large-block proponents executed a hard fork to establish a new Bitcoin iteration, though they struggled to secure the original network’s majority nodes or miners.
Bitcoin Cash is a blockchain payment system that originated by forking the Bitcoin blockchain. In 2018, Bitcoin Cash experienced its hard fork, resulting in Bitcoin ABC and Bitcoin SV. However, it retained the Bitcoin Cash moniker.
The comments, insights, and analyses provided herein are solely for informational objectives. For additional details, consult our information repository. At the time of composing this article, the author’s holdings include BTC and XRP.
You may also like
